Commentary: ANSI C won't work for ESL
(05/10/2007 2:36 PM EDT), EE Times
While SystemC has been accepted by most systems, semiconductor, and EDA companies as the language of choice for high-speed system-level modeling, there is a continued debate over which language is best for electronic system level (ESL) synthesis.
Some prefer ANSI C or C++. They argue that the breadth of algorithmic software available in these languages and the large numbers of people familiar with them make them a natural fit for synthesizing hardware implementations from high-level algorithmic descriptions.
These arguments have some merit, and at first blush the prospect of re-using existing software source code for hardware implementation looks fast and easy. Unfortunately, hardware designers attempting this while continuing to meet the challenging power consumption, silicon area, and performance demands of today's high-volume consumer oriented systems-on-chip will encounter two intractable problems. Source code optimized for execution on a processor is unsuitable for direct hardware implementation, and C and C++ have a fundamental inability to express constructs that are necessary for effective hardware design.
![]() |
E-mail This Article | ![]() |
![]() |
Printer-Friendly Page |
Related News
Breaking News
- RISC-V International Promotes Andrea Gallo to CEO
- See the 2025 Best Edge AI Processor IP at the Embedded Vision Summit
- Andes Technology Showcases RISC-V AI Leadership at RISC-V Summit Europe 2025
- RISC-V Royalty-Driven Revenue to Exceed License Revenue by 2027
- Keysom Unveils Keysom Core Explorer V1.0
Most Popular
- RISC-V International Promotes Andrea Gallo to CEO
- See the 2025 Best Edge AI Processor IP at the Embedded Vision Summit
- Andes Technology Showcases RISC-V AI Leadership at RISC-V Summit Europe 2025
- Ceva, Inc. Announces First Quarter 2025 Financial Results
- Cadence Unveils Millennium M2000 Supercomputer with NVIDIA Blackwell Systems to Transform AI-Driven Silicon, Systems and Drug Design